“Sex” isn’t in the Constitution, according to Alito & Thomas: YOU can’t have it.
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis: “If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the aw respectable.”
“Marriage” isn’t in the Constitution, according to Alito & Thomas: YOU can’t have it.
St. Augustine: “An unjust law is no law at all.”
“Children” are not in the Constitution, according to Alito & Thomas: YOU cannot have any.
Roy Cohn: “I don’t want to know what the law is. I want to know who the judge is.”
“God” is not in the Constitution, according to Alito & Thomas” God doesn’t exist.
Chief Justice John Marshall {Bank}: “A Constitution, from its nature, deals in generals, not in detail. Its framers cannot conceive minute distinctions which arise in the progress of the nation, and therefore confine it to the establishment of broad and general principles.”
The internet, TV, A/C, cares, jet planes, flush toilets, YOUR smartphone, etc. are NOT in the Constitution, according to Alito & Thomas, therefore they don’t exist – and if they did – YOU can’t have them.
REAL historian Gary Wills [“A Necessary Evil”]: “We interpret the Constitution in terms of concepts and words..not in the document. Nowhere does the Constitution mention checks, or balances, or separation of powers, or co-equal branches [or even branches] of government, or states rights [or any rights in the original, unamended document].”
Question: IF the Founders intended the Constitution to be inscribed in stone, never to be changed or modified, WHY did they include an amendment process???
Question: IF the Founders intended the Constitution to be final, to have listed ALL “rights,” WHY did the Ninth Amendment read: “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”????? This ALONE destroys Alito’s preposterous argument.
“Corporation” is not in the Constitution, but, beginning with “Santa Clara” the Supreme Court has. GIVEN corporations “rights” – including declaring them to be “people,” GIVING them “free speech” rights [to launder money & corrupt gov’t], GIVEN them “religious rights” [violating corporate principles!], etc. So, the Supreme Court itself, by its own fraudulent conduct, has illustrated it CAN “find” “Constitutional rights” IF it WANTS TO.
The Alito-Thomas “court” has now said abortion has no Constitutional rights. “Dobbs’. will now stand with “Dred Scott” in Supreme Court INFAMY. Both were decided for “originalism” reasons. Both will prove destructive. One part of a chain of events leading to civil political war; one could be part of a chain of events leading to civil religious war.
Chief Justice Roger Taney, in “Dred Scott”: The Framers did not intend for Blacks to be citizens, and the Constitution “must be construed now as it was understood at the time of its adoption.” [the “not-in-the-Constitution theory]
“Justice’ Barrett famously said her Court was not a bunch of partisan political hacks. YOU decide, on the basis of the 2022 “supreme court’s” decisions, on the basis of the McConnell/Trump/Roberts “court’s” 2005-2022. PATTERN. The corporate “win” rate, before 2022 was 70%. The “religious right” “win” rate was 90% BEFORE 2022. Are they “partisan political hacks”? YOU. decide – on the basis of their own track record.
Anti-abortionism, the “pro-life” agenda is RELIGIOUS DOGMA. Putting RELIGIOUS DOGMA into American law is un-Constitutional.: “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion..” An “established religion” is an official or state church – on which YOU are compelled to support financially and legally.
The appointing of “pro-life” judges in un-Constitutional. Article VI: “no religious Test shall ever be required as aQualification to any Office or Public Trust under the United States.”
It has been Republican policy since 1980 to appoint “pro-life” judges. Republican judicial nominees are “screened” by “social conservatives” to make SURE they are “pro-life.” ALL six current Republican Supreme Court “justices” were raised in one specific fundamentalist church. YOU decide – was this an “accident”?
Criminalizing abortion attacks a century of Supreme Court rulings on privacy, marriage, child bearing.
Justice Brandeis [“Olmstead”]; the most important 4th Amendment point was the spirit behind theAmendment, which was to ensure privacy: “The makers of our Constitution undertook..to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone – the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men..The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachments by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
“…the right to be let alone.. most valued by civilized men…. insidious encroachments by men of zeal…”
Amendment IV: “The right of the people to be secure i their persons…” Would a ‘reasonable person” interpret this to mean the he or she had 100% control over their body – and NOT some government , or some church ?
Amendment XIII: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States..”
Would a person, sentenced to mandatory motherhood, be considered a slave – of the state? Are “we” in 2lst century America going to sentence pregnant persons to, first, 9 months of pregnancy, then l8 years of child care against their wishes?
Can a church YOU don’t attend, may even despise, make laws over YOUR life and YOUR body? Is ANYTHING more cruel, more arrogant, more un-American, more un-Constitutional. than THIS????? If a church, or a group of churches, USING. “government”, can control YOUR. life, control. YOUR. sex and reproductive life – what “rights” do. YOU. have???
If THIS. “supreme court”. can do this to YOU, what else will they do?????
With Justice For All 