Is it over??? Is America about to complete the shift from a “democracy” to a theocratic plutocracy with a president who has “immunity” from actions taken in office??????? America’s FAR RIGHT WING ‘team” hopes YOU won’t object. This radical, reactionary, TEAM now has maneuvered this possibility before the Roberts “supreme court,” where 6 reactionary “justices” are poised to – not only delay 3 trials of the perpetrator to after the 2024 election – but to engage in “writing a rule for the ages.”!!!!! In judging this possibility, consider:
1] corruption was the Founding generations NUMBER ONE concern. Madison’s incomplete notes for the roughly 110 day 1787 Constitutional Convention has “corruption” written down 54 times.
2] Research: was “immunity” EVER. discussed during the 1787-1791 period – at the Philadelphia meetings, or, at the 13 state constitutional meetings???
3] Research: was “immunity” EVER discussed during the impeachment process against President Andrew Johnson?
4]. Research: was “immunity” EVER discussed during the impeachment process against Richard Nixon?
5] the word “immunity” is. NOT. in the Constitution – thus, it fails the Alito “test” – you can’t have it if it doesn’t exist in the Constitution!!!!!!!!!
6] kings have immunity – presidents do NOT; a major part of the 1775-1783 revolutionary era was the arbitrary, corrupt conduct of George III – why would America go backwards to 1775??????
7]. Gorsuch: “We are writing a rule for the ages.” NO they can’t [constitutionally]. Amending the Constitution is a process which does. NOT. involve ANY “supreme court,’ let alone this one
8] a Supreme Court can “interpret” the Constitution, so if “immunity” of a president [or anybody] ISN’T in the document, nor is there ANY hint of it – what is there to “interpret??? ***They do not have the Constitutional power to make up “a rule for the ages.” That was done in 1787.
9]. the Constitution was written by 55 MEN, signed by 39, from all 13 states – why don’t we have a public forum on if ANY president should have a power NOT. in the Constitution???
10]. Trump’s “immunity” argument has been REJECTED. by EVEERY judge who heard it – what do the 9 [6] “justices’ know that multiple courts did not??? Research what those courts said!!!!!
11]. the case itself is an unnecessary review of a UNANIMOUS 3-judge D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel said – and forcefully said in no uncertain language that Trump could be prosecuted. Research their explicit language!!!!!
12] “justice” Barrett got Trump lawyer Sauer to admit many of Trump’s alleged acts amount to private conduct that would. NOT. be shielded from prosecution
13] why is THIS “supreme court” parsing differences between “private” and “public’ conduct of a president, unnecessarily splitting hairs?: how does one decide the difference on ANYTHING that has to do with a presidency charged with 24/7 running a country, a “democracy,” when virtually EVERY word from ANY president is/can be consequential???
14] when is an American president “off duty” ?
15] how can Alito say “I’m not discussing the particular facts of this case”????? – what does ANY court do??? – isn’t that their job??? how can they issue a coherent decision if they don’t address the “particular facts of this case”???????????
*****is this a clever way for fogging things up – a clever way to find the perp innocent, by going off into hypotheticals that may or may not occur – bur have only tangential, at best, relationship to what occurred 2017-2021???
16]. there is a long list of Trump actions, publicly recorded, including “perfect phone calls,” that refute ANY claim that he did not try to abuse powers of the presidency to stay in power – does America ignore this???????? ***think of a kid, brought to the principal’s office for punching another kid in the lunchroom – witnessed by dozens – who denies he punched the other kid – is he gonna get off scot-free?
17]. how can a “democracy” accept Sauer’s contention a president is free during their presidency to commit lawless acts; subject to prosecution only AFTER impeachment convicts. So for 4 years, the person runs amok – like a king, or dictator???
18]. if “no man is above the law” – how can there be a SERIOUS discussion of presidential immunity – in the “supreme court” no less???????? If ANY president is above the law, we have. NO DEMOCRACY
19]. if. ANY American has ANY kind of “immunity” – what’s the difference between that and a dictatorship??? Dictators, like the king we got rid of in 1776-83, have immunity
20] given the Roberts “court” track record [Citizens United, Shelby County, gun cases, Dobbs, religious “rights” cases, and MUCH MORE] illustrating their profound ignorance of American history and legal precedent – why trust them as the people who “are writing a rule for the ages”???????? [ Dobbs is a TOTAL BIG LIE: first state law against abortuon was 1821, colonists brought English abortion common law here, etc; on gun decisions, the Roberts “court” cherry picked one state law later overturned – against 3 others who wanted gun restrictions, first concealed carry gun law: 1813, etc.]
***If YOU are a patriotic American – then YOU have much to be concerned about. If YOU are upset over government in your life, then a president, any president, who has “immunity” from consequences over what he does in office – is a FAR bigger threat to YOU, and ALL other Americans than ANY president from 1789 – forward, ANY president.
Speak out now, or, YOU just may soon be living in a dictatorship. o
With Justice For All 